DOGE’s promise of openness masks a chaotic and unusable data system.

Transparency was supposed to be a feature—not a flaw. But the Department of Government Efficiency’s “Wall of Receipts” is more smoke and mirrors than clarity, riddled with errors and vague labels that hide more than they reveal.

Transparency is a beautiful word—until it’s weaponized. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Elon Musk’s headline-grabbing brainchild, promised a new era of openness, where taxpayers could finally see where their money was going—and where it shouldn’t. But dig just beneath the surface of DOGE’s much-hyped “Wall of Receipts” and you are met with a spreadsheet fever dream: duplicate entries, inflated savings, vague descriptions, and entire programs listed as “inefficient” with little to no explanation. It is not just confusing—it’s unusable.

DOGE dismantled over 80% of USAID’s operations. From health to democracy, education to crisis response—entire infrastructures vanished without explanation, leaving international partners stunned.

The biggest wreckage in this data disaster is: U.S. development aid. In a matter of months, DOGE torpedoed over 80% of USAID’s operations, including 5,800 multiyear contracts—an estimated $54 billion worth of programming. All gone. Many of these cuts affect global health, democracy promotion, education, and crisis response initiatives. For international partners and local civil society groups, the impact has been devastating. One day you are mid-project, rebuilding health systems or training women leaders—the next day, the funding evaporates, and thers no clear document explaining why or how it happened.

And good luck figuring it out. Wait! That is not the official DOGE database does not differentiate between canceled, paused, or restructured contracts. Multiple entries list vague names like “Democracy Program” or “Global Services,” often repeated with different price tags. Some contracts list zero-dollar savings next to multi-million-dollar termination notices. Others mysteriously reappear under different departments. If you are an analyst, journalist, or humanitarian agency trying to make sense of this data, you are stuck building puzzles with missing pieces—and no picture on the box.

It is not just a bureaucratic headache—it’s an accountability crisis. The erasure of development programming is being masked by chaos, making it impossible for watchdogs or Congress to assess what was cut, what was saved, and what the actual cost of this “efficiency” really is. And while lawsuits fly over whether the dismantling of USAID was even legal, aid workers and communities across the globe are already feeling the real-world effects. This is not  just a data glitch—it is lives, livelihoods, and decades of hard-won development progress disappearing into a black hole of mismanagement.

If this story sounds familiar, that’s because it is. Whistleblowers from within U.S. agencies, like the one recently spotlighted for exposing corruption in funded research, are increasingly stepping forward—not just because money is being misused, but because systems meant to ensure transparency are being twisted into tools of ambiguity. DOGE’s chaotic data dump follows the same pattern: dazzle the public with open data, but make it so messy and incomplete that it’s functionally meaningless.

The promise of greater efficiency is seductive. But without clean data, public input, and thoughtful transition planning, it’s nothing more than chaos in a sleek new outfit. Development aid is about long-term trust and partnership. When it’s slashed overnight with no clear rationale and no reliable recordkeeping, what’s left is not efficiency—it is a vacuum. And the people who pay the price are rarely the ones making the cuts.

Finally, true efficiency requires trust, precision, and careful transition—not slash-and-burn budgeting. What remains is not progress, but a vacuum. And the consequences stretch far beyond a spreadsheet. If this article resonates with you, please consider sharing it using the button below. I’d also be happy to continue the conversation and discuss some of the world’s most pressing humanitarian crises. betiguel@mzninternational.com